Recent Entries

CFP: Performance, New Media, and Surveillance

Even in the Situation Room, the Medium is the Message

Having IP Problems with Google? Better Accept a Cookie, and Leave your Name at the Door

Proof Sergey Brin is Bored: Google SearchWiki with Sound

Position Announcement: Yale Information Society Project Fellowships

Maltego: Data-Mining Tool for the Masses

SearchWiki: Boon for Google, Bust for Privacy

The Future of Privacy Forum


Categories

4S  4th Amendment  A2K  AOIR  AOL  Academic  Amateur data mining  Ask.com  Auto Black Boxes  Behavioral targeting  Blogging  Books  CFP  CFP08  CIPR  Cellphones  Censorship  China  ChoicePoint  Conferences  Constitution  Contextual Integrity  Cookies  Copyright  DRM  DSRC  Dan Solove  Data Aggregation  Data mining  Dataveillance  Dissertation  DoubleClick  Ethics  Facebook  Facial recognition  Flickr  GPS  Gmail  Google  Google Print  Helen Nissenbaum  Human Rights  Humor  IINW  ISP  Identity  Identity 2.0  Information theory  Intellectual Privacy  Intellectual Property  Interfaces  Internet  Law  Libraries  Locational privacy  Media  Media Ecology  Microsoft  Milwaukee  MySpace  Netaveillance  Networked Vehicle Systems  OneWebDay  Online Privacy  Orkut  PORTIA  Paid Search  Perfect Search  Personal  Personalized Search  Policy  Privacy  Privacy in Public  Privacy on the Roads  Publications  Quaero  RFID  Reputation systems  Riya  SOIS  Search Engine Bias  Search Engines  Search privacy  Siva Vaidhyanathan  Social networks  Spyware  Street View  Surveillance  Talks  Technology & Society  TrackMeNot  Uncategorized  Values in Design  Web 2.0  Wi-fi  Wikipedia  Yahoo  YouTube  eHealth  iPod 

Rss Feed




  • Powered by FeedBlitz
  • Campaigns

    Join EFF Today

    I support individual rights

    Stop Data Retention

    I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

    Meta

    Creative Commons License

    Update on Local Library SSN Practices

    Posted on Wednesday, August 27th, 2008 at 9:19 am

    While I never received a reply to my letter to the Shorewood, Wisconsin Public Library regarding its requiring I provide my social security number to obtain a library card, I do have anecdotal evidence that the library might have changed its policy.

    This week my wife obtained her library card, and while the paperwork still requested both a valid social security number and a drivers license, the person assisting my wife stated that these were optional. My wife didn’t even have to ask about whether providing this personal and sensitive information was necessary; the librarian simply volunteered the information.

    So, what can we learn from this? Either (a) the library has changed its policy regarding forcing patrons to provide their social security (and drivers license) number to gain borrowing privileges; (b) the librarian I dealt with was not trained properly regarding the need to provide this sensitive information; or (c) the librarian my wife dealt with is equally concerned with having a library collection sensitive patron information, and decided to go against policy and allow her to obtain a library card without divulging the information.

    Either way, we need clarification as to what the library’s policy is regarding the collection and retention of sensitive patron information, along with a summary of how individual librarians are trained on that policy, and perhaps an audit on how accurately that policy is being executed.

    I will follow up with the Director, and report any news.

    Leave a Reply