Home » Google, Privacy, Search privacy

Disrupting Google’s homepage with a 14-charater string

3 June 2008 1,123 views 4 Comments Print This Post

Much of Google’s resistance to adding a link to its privacy policy on its homepage seems to boil down to little more than aesthetics. As Steve Langdon, a Google spokesman, puts it: “We do believe that having very limited text on our home page.”

Certainly, Google’s simple homepage design has its value. Much of Google’s early success can be attributed to the speed at which its homepage loaded, especially with early Internet users relying on dial-up connections. Compared to Yahoo’s homepage that was loaded with images and display ads, Google’s spartan page loaded so fast that some users would mistakenly sit in front of the screen waiting for more items to load.

A brief history of Google’s homepage reveals their commitment to limiting the amount of content displayed.

But, of course, the current battle over the visibility of Google’s privacy policy isn’t about load time. No one is asking Google to add a banner ad for the Privacy Center, embed one of its YouTube privacy videos, or anything else that would slow down the loading of the page.

This is about adding a simple 14-character hyperlink: Privacy Policy.

From this: Google homepage

To this: Google homepage with privacy link

I struggle to understand why Google remains so obstinate on this issue.

Note that EPIC and a coalition of a dozen privacy organizations have urged Google to include a link from its homepage to its privacy policy. More details here.

Related Posts »

4 Comments »

  • Hedi said:

    Didn’t knew that. Wondering like you do why Google doesn’t do something to that!

  • Check Backlink said:

    Well that really baffled me at that time too. It really is weird though.

  • Lyle and Scott said:

    I agree. Certainly weird. I remember those days when Google came out. It was such a hugs hype all around.

  • Green Building said:

    Interesting. But to my knowledge, they have changed this now I think. But yet to confirm on that since I’m not 100% sure

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.