Recent Entries

Seeking References on Cellphone Surveillance

Cuil not so Cool

New “Cuil” Search Engines Decides User Logs Aren’t Necessary

Local Library uses RFID to Manage Materials, but Privacy Concerns Abound

Visibility of Googe’s Privacy Policy Depends on Where you Live

A Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Online Video

Google (Quietly/Oddly) Adds Privacy Link to Homepage

Court Orders Google to Give All YouTube User Histories to Viacom


Categories

4S  4th Amendment  A2K  AOIR  AOL  Academic  Amateur data mining  Andrew Keen  Ask.com  Auto Black Boxes  Behavioral targeting  Blogging  Books  CEPE  CFP08  Cellphones  Censorship  China  ChoicePoint  Conferences  Constitution  Contextual Integrity  Cookies  Copyright  DRM  DSRC  Dan Solove  Data Aggregation  Data mining  Data retention  Dataveillance  Dissertation  DoubleClick  Ethics  Facebook  Facial recognition  Flickr  GPS  Gmail  Google  Google News  Google Print  HealthVault  Humor  IINW  ISP  Identity  Identity 2.0  Information theory  Intellectual Privacy  Intellectual Property  Interfaces  Internet  Knowledge Tools  Law  Libraries  Locational privacy  Media  Media Ecology  Microsoft  MySpace  Netaveillance  Networked Vehicle Systems  Online Privacy  Orkut  PORTIA  Paid Search  Perfect Search  Personal  Personalized Search  Privacy  Privacy in Public  Privacy on the Roads  Publications  Quaero  RFID  Reputation systems  Riya  Search Engine Bias  Search Engines  Search privacy  Siva Vaidhyanathan  Social networks  Spyware  Street View  Surveillance  Talks  Technology  Technology & Society  TrackMeNot  Uncategorized  Values in Design  Web 2.0  Wi-fi  Wikipedia  Yahoo  YouTube  eHealth  iPod  iTunes 

Rss Feed




  • Powered by FeedBlitz
  • Campaigns

    Join EFF Today

    I support individual rights

    Stop Data Retention

    I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

    Meta

    Creative Commons License

    Comparing Search Engine Privacy Policy Visibility

    Posted on Tuesday, May 27th, 2008 at 10:15 pm

    Prompted by Google’s resistance to cluttering its homepage with a link to its privacy policy, I decided to take a quick tour of the major search engines to compare the relative visibility of their privacy policies.

    AOL, Microsoft, and Yahoo! have visible privacy policies on both their homepages and search results page (which is especially important if you use automatic search toolbars on browsers without visiting the homepage).

    Neither Ask nor Google provide direct links to their privacy policy on their homepage or results pages.

    [**UPDATE**  On July 3, 2008, Google added a link to their privacy policy on both its homepage and search results page. Details here]

    Details below:

    AOL

    AOL search homeThe main AOL homepage includes a link to its privacy policy. The link is at the very bottom of the page (requires some scrolling) in a standard box with other corporate and legal information. It appears in a font and color that matches the other URLs on the homepage.

    AOL’s search homepage, however, does not include any link to a privacy policy. This page closely follows the aesthetics of Google’s homepage, presumably since Google provides AOL’s search results. There is a somewhat prominent link to “About This Page,” which, in turn, provides a link to AOL’s privacy policy. (Presumably most users access AOL search via the main homepage, not this secondary page.)

    AOL’s search results page also includes a link to the privacy policy at the very bottom of the page.

    Ask

    Ask search homeAsk’s homepage does not include a link to a privacy policy. Nor is there a link if you click on “About” to learn more about Ask.com (one would have to click on a light-gray link for “Terms of Service” from there to find a link to Ask’s privacy policy).

    Ask’s homepage does include a small, but prominent, link to Ask Eraser in the upper right corner, which opens a small window prompting the user to turn on/off the privacy-enhancing service, and also providing links to the Ask Eraser FAQ. While this provides privacy-enhancing functions, no link to the actual privacy policy is included in these prompts.

    Ask’s search results page does not include a link to its privacy policy.

    Google

    Google search homeGoogle’s homepage does not include a link to a privacy policy. One must click on “About Google” to find a link to its privacy policy. This link is visible at the bottom of the page (no need to scroll on standard screens), and is in a font and color that matches the other URLs on page.

    Google’s search results page does not include a link to its privacy policy.

    Updated 7/4/08: Google now includes a link to its privacy policy on both its homepage and search results pages. Details here.

    Microsoft

    Microsoft search homeMicrosoft’s Live search homepage does include a link to its privacy policy. It is a small, gray link in the bottom left corner, which is visible without scrolling in a standard screen.

    Microsoft’s search results page similarly includes a link to the privacy policy.

    Yahoo!

    The main Yahoo! homepage includes a link to its privacy policy. The link is at the very bottom of the page (requires some scrolling) in a standard box with other corporate and legal information. It appears in a font and color that matches the other URLs on the homepage, although slightly smaller.

    Yahoo search homeYahoo!’s search homepage also includes a link to its privacy policy. The link is quite small and in a light color, but still prominent.

    Yahoo!’s search results page also includes a link to the privacy policy at the very bottom of the page, albeit small and in a light font.

    Related Posts:

    2 Responses to “Comparing Search Engine Privacy Policy Visibility”

    1. eric Says:

      let’s be honest, how many people do you think actually click and read the privacy policy ANYWHERE (shops, SEs or wherever). so, i think the people who actually want to read, can find it in the about section, whats the problem with that?

    2. Michael Zimmer Says:

      @ eric:

      Sure, folks how are already educated and concerned about their privacy might be smart enough to click through an “About” page to find a search engine’s privacy policy. But what about those who aren’t as adept on privacy concerns or the typical design of Web sites? Consider:

      1) For companies to claim to be focused on protecting user privacy, they should go out of their way to provide access to that information for all users. There is virtually zero cost to providing a direct link on the homepage to a privacy policy. I can’t think of any technical, economic, or policy reason not to have one there. Forcing people to click through some other page is an unnecessary burden (perhaps a small burden, but a burden nonetheless). If you see no problem in clicking through an “About” page, what is the tangible problem with having another small link to the policy itself?

      2) Arguments like “no one reads them anyway” are not only tenuous (do you have statistics to support that claim?), but also irrelevant. When considering providing privacy protection, we should design for the exceptions, not the norms. Consider the scenario where a user is not away of any privacy issues related to searching the Web. After processing numerous searches, she suddenly examines the screen more closely and notices a link to a privacy policy. She clicks it, and becomes more educated about the privacy issues. Without such a link present, these kinds of users would never have the opportunity to become educated users of the search service.

      Thanks for the comment.

    Leave a Reply