Recent Entries

CFP: Performance, New Media, and Surveillance

Even in the Situation Room, the Medium is the Message

Having IP Problems with Google? Better Accept a Cookie, and Leave your Name at the Door

Proof Sergey Brin is Bored: Google SearchWiki with Sound

Position Announcement: Yale Information Society Project Fellowships

Maltego: Data-Mining Tool for the Masses

SearchWiki: Boon for Google, Bust for Privacy

The Future of Privacy Forum


Categories

4S  4th Amendment  A2K  AOIR  AOL  Academic  Amateur data mining  Ask.com  Auto Black Boxes  Behavioral targeting  Blogging  Books  CFP  CFP08  CIPR  Cellphones  Censorship  China  ChoicePoint  Conferences  Constitution  Contextual Integrity  Cookies  Copyright  DRM  DSRC  Dan Solove  Data Aggregation  Data mining  Dataveillance  Dissertation  DoubleClick  Ethics  Facebook  Facial recognition  Flickr  GPS  Gmail  Google  Google Print  Helen Nissenbaum  Human Rights  Humor  IINW  ISP  Identity  Identity 2.0  Information theory  Intellectual Privacy  Intellectual Property  Interfaces  Internet  Law  Libraries  Locational privacy  Media  Media Ecology  Microsoft  Milwaukee  MySpace  Netaveillance  Networked Vehicle Systems  OneWebDay  Online Privacy  Orkut  PORTIA  Paid Search  Perfect Search  Personal  Personalized Search  Policy  Privacy  Privacy in Public  Privacy on the Roads  Publications  Quaero  RFID  Reputation systems  Riya  SOIS  Search Engine Bias  Search Engines  Search privacy  Siva Vaidhyanathan  Social networks  Spyware  Street View  Surveillance  Talks  Technology & Society  TrackMeNot  Uncategorized  Values in Design  Web 2.0  Wi-fi  Wikipedia  Yahoo  YouTube  eHealth  iPod 

Rss Feed




  • Powered by FeedBlitz
  • Campaigns

    Join EFF Today

    I support individual rights

    Stop Data Retention

    I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

    Meta

    Creative Commons License

    Libraries vs. Bookstores vs. Google

    Posted on Thursday, May 17th, 2007 at 6:22 pm

    Library Juice posts a wonderful essay by Tracy Nectoux, a library student at UIUC, who was assigned to visit a bookstore and compare the atmosphere to a library’s atmosphere. I think it’s helpful to take the comparison one step further and include Google Book Search, along with patron privacy in the mix. Here’s a summary of some of Nectoux’s comparisons, with Google Book Search and privacy concerns added in by me (yellow background):



    Libraries


    Bookstores


    Google
    Book
    Search


    Purpose


    Public libraries are set up so that anyone who wants to can give himself or herself a free university education.


    The purpose of bookstores is to make profit by selling books, CDs, DVDs, coffee, etc.


    The purpose of Google Book Search is to provide access to books, while also making a profit by placing contextual ads.


    Institution
    Type


    Libraries are public institutions.


    Bookstores are private institutions.


    Google is a publicly-traded corporation whose first duty is to the shareholders.


    Mission


    Foremost in the American Library Association’s mission, priority areas, and goals are intellectual freedom, access to all, and public awareness.


    Bookstores are businesses whose bottom line is profit. First Amendment freedoms, civil rights issues, equal access to all, etc. are just not going to be at the top of their yearly accounting financial quotas.


    Same as Bookstores.


    Patron Privacy


    Patrons can use the public library anonymously. Public libraries are also bound by the ALA’s Code of Ethics to protect patron privacy. The ALA has stood up to government surveillance in both the McCarthy and Cold War eras, and is the only major public organization that is at the forefront of fighting the USA PATRIOT Act.


    Bookstores regularly collect customers’ personal and transactional data through their “membership” or “frequent shopper” programs. Such information is often shared with third parties.


    Google relies on Web cookies to track and aggregate user’s search activity, including book searches. A Google Account is required to access full text of many books.

    In the dissertation, I discuss in more detail how the growing shift in information-seeking activities from public libraries (as well as bookstores) to Google represents a potentially significant shift in existing informational norms regarding the collection and flow of personal information. More to come…

    Related Posts:

    3 Responses to “Libraries vs. Bookstores vs. Google”

    1. Dissent Says:

      I’ll be interested in seeing what you find about libraries, as I just blogged about some new policies being implemented on a local level that seem to weaken privacy protections in public libraries.

    2. Chris Hoofnagle Says:

      Hi Michael,

      Not only do libraries have the ALA ethics code, patron privacy is protected by statute or by attorney general opinion in all 50 states.

      Chris

    3. Michael Zimmer Says:

      Hi Chris - excellent point. Norms of freedom of inquiry within libraries have (thankfully) been encoded into law.

      DIssent - I’ll check that story. Thanks.

    Leave a Reply