Recent Entries

Seeking References on Cellphone Surveillance

Cuil not so Cool

New “Cuil” Search Engines Decides User Logs Aren’t Necessary

Local Library uses RFID to Manage Materials, but Privacy Concerns Abound

Visibility of Googe’s Privacy Policy Depends on Where you Live

A Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Online Video

Google (Quietly/Oddly) Adds Privacy Link to Homepage

Court Orders Google to Give All YouTube User Histories to Viacom


Categories

4S  4th Amendment  A2K  AOIR  AOL  Academic  Amateur data mining  Andrew Keen  Ask.com  Auto Black Boxes  Behavioral targeting  Blogging  Books  CEPE  CFP08  Cellphones  Censorship  China  ChoicePoint  Conferences  Constitution  Contextual Integrity  Cookies  Copyright  DRM  DSRC  Dan Solove  Data Aggregation  Data mining  Data retention  Dataveillance  Dissertation  DoubleClick  Ethics  Facebook  Facial recognition  Flickr  GPS  Gmail  Google  Google News  Google Print  HealthVault  Humor  IINW  ISP  Identity  Identity 2.0  Information theory  Intellectual Privacy  Intellectual Property  Interfaces  Internet  Knowledge Tools  Law  Libraries  Locational privacy  Media  Media Ecology  Microsoft  MySpace  Netaveillance  Networked Vehicle Systems  Online Privacy  Orkut  PORTIA  Paid Search  Perfect Search  Personal  Personalized Search  Privacy  Privacy in Public  Privacy on the Roads  Publications  Quaero  RFID  Reputation systems  Riya  Search Engine Bias  Search Engines  Search privacy  Siva Vaidhyanathan  Social networks  Spyware  Street View  Surveillance  Talks  Technology  Technology & Society  TrackMeNot  Uncategorized  Values in Design  Web 2.0  Wi-fi  Wikipedia  Yahoo  YouTube  eHealth  iPod  iTunes 

Rss Feed




  • Powered by FeedBlitz
  • Campaigns

    Join EFF Today

    I support individual rights

    Stop Data Retention

    I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

    Meta

    Creative Commons License

    Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Others to Address Human Rights Violations

    Posted on Saturday, January 20th, 2007 at 2:43 pm

    An important press release came out this week regarding a coalition of Internet companies, IT providers, human rights organizations, and academics joining forces to address human rights violations enabled by technologies and practices by some of the member organizations, such as providing means of surveillance for regimes like China to identify and jail dissident citizens. From the release:

    A diverse group of companies, academics, investors, technology leaders and human rights organizations announced today its intention to seek solutions to the free expression and privacy challenges faced by technology and communications companies doing business internationally.

    The process – which aims to produce a set of principles guiding company behavior when faced with laws, regulations and policies that interfere with the achievement of human rights – marks a new phase in efforts that these groups began in 2006.

    Last year, Google, Microsoft, Vodafone and Yahoo!, with the facilitation of Business for Social Responsibility (BSR) and advice from the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School, initiated a series of dialogues to gain a fuller understanding of free expression and privacy as they relate to the use of technology worldwide.

    At the same time, the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) was also convening technology leaders, investors and human rights advocates to discuss how to advance civil liberties on the Internet in the face of laws that run contrary to international standards for human rights.

    Both processes benefited from dialogue, research and policy expertise on internet filtering and surveillance practices from the OpenNet Consensus, a coalition of academic institutions including the University of California Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism and School of Law-Boalt Hall, the Berkman Center and others.

    The new combined group, in addition to developing the principles, seeks to advance their effectiveness by establishing a framework to implement the principles, hold signatories accountable and provide for ongoing learning.

    “Technology companies have played a vital role building the economy and providing tools important for democratic reform in developing countries. But some governments have found ways to turn technology against their citizens — monitoring legitimate online activities and censoring democratic material,” CDT Executive Director Leslie Harris said. “It is vital that we identify solutions that preserve the enormous democratic value provided by technological development, while at the same time protecting the human rights and civil liberties of those who stand to benefit from that expansion.”

    More commentary John Palfrey and Rebecca MacKinoon, as well as Yahoo itself.

    Related Posts:

    Leave a Reply