Recent Entries

Seeking References on Cellphone Surveillance

Cuil not so Cool

New “Cuil” Search Engines Decides User Logs Aren’t Necessary

Local Library uses RFID to Manage Materials, but Privacy Concerns Abound

Visibility of Googe’s Privacy Policy Depends on Where you Live

A Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Online Video

Google (Quietly/Oddly) Adds Privacy Link to Homepage

Court Orders Google to Give All YouTube User Histories to Viacom


Categories

4S  4th Amendment  A2K  AOIR  AOL  Academic  Amateur data mining  Andrew Keen  Ask.com  Auto Black Boxes  Behavioral targeting  Blogging  Books  CEPE  CFP08  Cellphones  Censorship  China  ChoicePoint  Conferences  Constitution  Contextual Integrity  Cookies  Copyright  DRM  DSRC  Dan Solove  Data Aggregation  Data mining  Data retention  Dataveillance  Dissertation  DoubleClick  Ethics  Facebook  Facial recognition  Flickr  GPS  Gmail  Google  Google News  Google Print  HealthVault  Humor  IINW  ISP  Identity  Identity 2.0  Information theory  Intellectual Privacy  Intellectual Property  Interfaces  Internet  Knowledge Tools  Law  Libraries  Locational privacy  Media  Media Ecology  Microsoft  MySpace  Netaveillance  Networked Vehicle Systems  Online Privacy  Orkut  PORTIA  Paid Search  Perfect Search  Personal  Personalized Search  Privacy  Privacy in Public  Privacy on the Roads  Publications  Quaero  RFID  Reputation systems  Riya  Search Engine Bias  Search Engines  Search privacy  Siva Vaidhyanathan  Social networks  Spyware  Street View  Surveillance  Talks  Technology  Technology & Society  TrackMeNot  Uncategorized  Values in Design  Web 2.0  Wi-fi  Wikipedia  Yahoo  YouTube  eHealth  iPod  iTunes 

Rss Feed




  • Powered by FeedBlitz
  • Campaigns

    Join EFF Today

    I support individual rights

    Stop Data Retention

    I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

    Meta

    Creative Commons License

    Google No Longer Claims Completely Organic Results

    Posted on Thursday, February 16th, 2006 at 10:27 am

    Last month, Google changed their censorship policy after launching their censored Google.cn service in China. Now it seems Google has changed its “core principles” regarding providing only organic search results.

    Previously Google’s Principles included this statement:

    The order and contents of Google search results are completely automated. No one hand picks a particular result for a given search query, nor does Google ever insert jokes or send messages by changing the order of results. Occasionally, when a particular website is the subject of public attention, other sites begin linking to it. This may elevate its importance as gauged by our ranking software, which assigns a PageRank value based in part on who links to a given page. Higher ranking in Google results may lead to more awareness, which may lead to more links and so on.

    But if you look at that page now, it has the headline, “Does Google ever insert jokes or send messages by changing the order of its results?” with this answer:

    No. Occasionally, when a particular website is the subject of public attention, other sites begin linking to it. This may elevate its importance as gauged by our ranking software, which assigns a PageRank value based in part on who links to a given page. Higher ranking in Google results may lead to more awareness, which may lead to more links, and so on.

    Notice what is missing: “The order and contents of Google search results are completely automated. No one hand picks a particular result for a given search query.”

    It is amazing how easily one’s core principles can change.

    [via Search Engine Journal]

    Related Posts:

    Leave a Reply