<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banned Books Week 2009: Ignorance is No Armor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/09/26/banned-books-week-2009-ignorance-is-no-armor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/09/26/banned-books-week-2009-ignorance-is-no-armor/</link>
	<description>information ethics : privacy : new media : values in design : 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Johnson</title>
		<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/09/26/banned-books-week-2009-ignorance-is-no-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-160319</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelzimmer.org/?p=1506#comment-160319</guid>
		<description>This romantic effusiveness from the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) calls God &quot;the father, who opens his arms to all&quot; -- an interesting attribution for them to make (on a number of levels). I will mention those that catch a Christian&#039;s eye. Jesus was condemned in part because he called God his Father (John 5:18), and clearly the Fatherhood of God is a teaching originating with Jesus. But Jesus expressly taught that God was not the Father of everyone (John 8:42), and that not everyone would go to heaven (John 3:16-18). The disparity between the NCAC&#039;s sentiment and the biblical record suggests the book lovers at the NCAC have not done their reading. Nor are they comfortable with capitalizing the word &quot;father&quot; when using it as a name of God. Maybe they think that to do so would be sexist? At least they capitalize &quot;God&quot;; but I dare say this usage will last only as long as pantheists and other pagans do not take offense at the NCAC&#039;s usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This romantic effusiveness from the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) calls God &#8220;the father, who opens his arms to all&#8221; &#8212; an interesting attribution for them to make (on a number of levels). I will mention those that catch a Christian&#8217;s eye. Jesus was condemned in part because he called God his Father (John 5:18), and clearly the Fatherhood of God is a teaching originating with Jesus. But Jesus expressly taught that God was not the Father of everyone (John 8:42), and that not everyone would go to heaven (John 3:16-18). The disparity between the NCAC&#8217;s sentiment and the biblical record suggests the book lovers at the NCAC have not done their reading. Nor are they comfortable with capitalizing the word &#8220;father&#8221; when using it as a name of God. Maybe they think that to do so would be sexist? At least they capitalize &#8220;God&#8221;; but I dare say this usage will last only as long as pantheists and other pagans do not take offense at the NCAC&#8217;s usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/09/26/banned-books-week-2009-ignorance-is-no-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-160293</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelzimmer.org/?p=1506#comment-160293</guid>
		<description>Not every word that is written deserves to be spread out. Just think of hate speech, which is out there and does harm the minds of young people. I&#039;m sorry , but I just don&#039;t share this sacralization of books, and certainly wouldn&#039;t call that freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not every word that is written deserves to be spread out. Just think of hate speech, which is out there and does harm the minds of young people. I&#8217;m sorry , but I just don&#8217;t share this sacralization of books, and certainly wouldn&#8217;t call that freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

