<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook&#8217;s Attempt at Open Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/02/26/facebooks-attempt-at-open-governance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/02/26/facebooks-attempt-at-open-governance/</link>
	<description>information ethics : new media : privacy : values in design : 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Zimmer</title>
		<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/02/26/facebooks-attempt-at-open-governance/comment-page-1/#comment-158324</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Zimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelzimmer.org/?p=1112#comment-158324</guid>
		<description>I agree, philosoraptor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, philosoraptor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philosoraptor</title>
		<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/02/26/facebooks-attempt-at-open-governance/comment-page-1/#comment-158319</link>
		<dc:creator>philosoraptor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelzimmer.org/?p=1112#comment-158319</guid>
		<description>About the last paragraph in your posting -- when I read Facebook&#039;s recent statement, I was a little perplexed by the fact that the two examples of product/feature changes seem very different.  One (the change to the interface design/layout) seems fair enough to me, but the second one (News Feed) belongs in a different category.  It&#039;s precisely the kind of change that (as you&#039;ve amply documented here) should be subject to advance comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the last paragraph in your posting &#8212; when I read Facebook&#8217;s recent statement, I was a little perplexed by the fact that the two examples of product/feature changes seem very different.  One (the change to the interface design/layout) seems fair enough to me, but the second one (News Feed) belongs in a different category.  It&#8217;s precisely the kind of change that (as you&#8217;ve amply documented here) should be subject to advance comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
