<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube: &#8220;Broadcast Yourself&#8221; means broadcasting your viewing interests for all to see</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelzimmer.org/2008/12/05/youtube-broadcast-yourself-means-broadcasting-your-viewing-interests-for-all-to-see/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2008/12/05/youtube-broadcast-yourself-means-broadcasting-your-viewing-interests-for-all-to-see/</link>
	<description>information ethics : privacy : new media : values in design : 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2008/12/05/youtube-broadcast-yourself-means-broadcasting-your-viewing-interests-for-all-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-157273</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelzimmer.org/?p=998#comment-157273</guid>
		<description>To Google&#039;s credit, this one struck me more as a &quot;lazy programmer&quot; problem than anything nefarious.  The &quot;hide subscribed groups&quot; is probably a feature ticket sitting under piles of other more important stuff.  Hopefully this will give them a little kick in the pants, because these are very valid criticisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Google&#8217;s credit, this one struck me more as a &#8220;lazy programmer&#8221; problem than anything nefarious.  The &#8220;hide subscribed groups&#8221; is probably a feature ticket sitting under piles of other more important stuff.  Hopefully this will give them a little kick in the pants, because these are very valid criticisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

