Recent Entries

CFP: Performance, New Media, and Surveillance

Even in the Situation Room, the Medium is the Message

Having IP Problems with Google? Better Accept a Cookie, and Leave your Name at the Door

Proof Sergey Brin is Bored: Google SearchWiki with Sound

Position Announcement: Yale Information Society Project Fellowships

Maltego: Data-Mining Tool for the Masses

SearchWiki: Boon for Google, Bust for Privacy

The Future of Privacy Forum


Categories

4S  4th Amendment  A2K  AOIR  AOL  Academic  Amateur data mining  Ask.com  Auto Black Boxes  Behavioral targeting  Blogging  Books  CFP  CFP08  CIPR  Cellphones  Censorship  China  ChoicePoint  Conferences  Constitution  Contextual Integrity  Cookies  Copyright  DRM  DSRC  Dan Solove  Data Aggregation  Data mining  Dataveillance  Dissertation  DoubleClick  Ethics  Facebook  Facial recognition  Flickr  GPS  Gmail  Google  Google Print  Helen Nissenbaum  Human Rights  Humor  IINW  ISP  Identity  Identity 2.0  Information theory  Intellectual Privacy  Intellectual Property  Interfaces  Internet  Law  Libraries  Locational privacy  Media  Media Ecology  Microsoft  Milwaukee  MySpace  Netaveillance  Networked Vehicle Systems  OneWebDay  Online Privacy  Orkut  PORTIA  Paid Search  Perfect Search  Personal  Personalized Search  Policy  Privacy  Privacy in Public  Privacy on the Roads  Publications  Quaero  RFID  Reputation systems  Riya  SOIS  Search Engine Bias  Search Engines  Search privacy  Siva Vaidhyanathan  Social networks  Spyware  Street View  Surveillance  Talks  Technology & Society  TrackMeNot  Uncategorized  Values in Design  Web 2.0  Wi-fi  Wikipedia  Yahoo  YouTube  eHealth  iPod 

Rss Feed




  • Powered by FeedBlitz
  • Campaigns

    Join EFF Today

    I support individual rights

    Stop Data Retention

    I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.

    Meta

    Creative Commons License

    Archival Ethics with Changing Practices: The Impact of Technology

    Posted on Saturday, August 30th, 2008 at 3:46 pm

    Reporting again from the SAA conference, I attended an excellent panel this morning on “Archival Ethics with Changing Practices: The Impact of Technology” (program; wiki page), featuring some excellent presentations on the way new information technology is spurring new ethical dilemmas for archives and archivists of all shapes and colors:

    Technology is changing the way archivists perform their jobs, but are archivists’ ethics changing under the strain of technology? As technology changes, archivists must reexamine their ethics. Ethics standards rooted in a paper and limited-access world are no match for the ethics required in an on-demand, multi-format world. What are the ethical standards that archivists should be employing in this technological world? How do archivists view their ethical role as technology pushes practices?

    I particularly enjoyed the presentation by Katie Shilton, a PhD student at UCLA. Her talk, “Ethics in the Digital Archive: Balancing Privacy, Participation, and Representation”, articulated key privacy concerns that arise given that archives are increasingly storing more granular and personally-identifiable information about subjects. She also called for a more contextual notion of privacy to help archives deal with the acquisition, storage, and potential access decisions related to personal information. Shilton also highlighted the increasing permanence of archival data, and suggested that perhaps archives should “forget” certain pieces of personal or sensitive information in their holdings. A controversial position for an archivist, but one that deserves further consideration.

    Leave a Reply