<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Discloses Blogger&#8217;s IP Address (No Subpoena Required)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/11/28/google-discloses-bloggers-ip-address-no-subpoena-required/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/11/28/google-discloses-bloggers-ip-address-no-subpoena-required/</link>
	<description>information ethics : new media : privacy : values in design : 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:46:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dissent</title>
		<link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/11/28/google-discloses-bloggers-ip-address-no-subpoena-required/comment-page-1/#comment-110494</link>
		<dc:creator>Dissent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/11/28/google-discloses-bloggers-ip-address-no-subpoena-required/#comment-110494</guid>
		<description>Over on C&#124;net, Declan McCullagh published a response from Google in which they assert that they did not &quot;voluntarily&quot; turn over the info.  Google&#039;s spokesperson stated, &quot;In terms of this case, we handed over the IP address of the Blogger after an Israeli court order required us to do so. Google has not blocked the blog or taken it down. Google gave the IP address to the court (the court handed it over to the complainant).&quot;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9824638-38.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;  at C&#124;net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over on C|net, Declan McCullagh published a response from Google in which they assert that they did not &#8220;voluntarily&#8221; turn over the info.  Google&#8217;s spokesperson stated, &#8220;In terms of this case, we handed over the IP address of the Blogger after an Israeli court order required us to do so. Google has not blocked the blog or taken it down. Google gave the IP address to the court (the court handed it over to the complainant).&#8221;   <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9824638-38.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" rel="nofollow">More</a>  at C|net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
