Posted by Michael Zimmer on 2/04/06 • Categorized as Google, Microsoft, Online Privacy, Privacy, Yahoo
Cnet asked each of the major search engine providers about data retention, IP tracking and other user search privacy issues. (I will fully process this later when I have more time)
[via John Battelle, and see his similar (and earlier) efforts]
4S 4th Amendment A2K Academic Amateur data mining Amazon AOIR AOL Ask.com Auto Black Boxes Behavioral targeting Blogging Books Cellphones Censorship CEPE CFP CFP08 China ChoicePoint CIPR Conferences Constitution Contextual Integrity Cookies Copyright Cuil Dan Solove Data Aggregation Data mining Dataveillance Dissertation DoubleClick DRM DSRC eHealth Ethics Facebook Facial recognition Flickr Gmail Google Google Book Search Google Print GPS HealthVault Helen Nissenbaum Human Rights Humor Identity Identity 2.0 Information ethics Information theory Intellectual freedom Intellectual Privacy Intellectual Property Interfaces Internet iPod ISP Larry Lessig Law Library & Information Science Library 2.0 Locational privacy Media Media Ecology Medical privacy Microsoft Milwaukee Music MySpace Netaveillance Networked Vehicle Systems OneWebDay Online Privacy Orkut Paid Search Perfect Search Personal Personalized Search Policy PORTIA Privacy Privacy in Public Privacy on the Roads Publications Quaero Reputation systems Research ethics RFID Riya Search Engine Bias Search Engines Search privacy Siva Vaidhyanathan Social media SOIS Spyware Street View Surveillance Talks Technology Technology & Society TrackMeNot Twitter Uncategorized Values in Design Web 2.0 Wi-fi Wikipedia Yahoo YouTube
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Powered by WordPress & Mimbo
|
|